Drawing for BIPHASIX

USPTO serial 75546684

BIPHASIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHATTI, FARAH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIPHASIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G L Pinchak

G L PINCHAK WATTS HOFFMANN FISHER & HEINKE CO LPA1100 SUPERIOR AVE E STE 1750CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2544UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005DERMAL AND MUCOSAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF LIQUIDS, CREAMS AND GELS APPLIED TO THE SKIN OR MUCOSA AND CONTAINING PHARMACEUTICAL AGENTS ENCAPSULATED IN VESICLES UTILIZING A LIPID-BASED MICROENCAPSULATING PROCESS, FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CARDIOLOGICAL DISEASES, DERMATOLOGICAL DISEASES, ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS, HEMATOLOGICAL DISORDERS, BACTERIAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, FUNGAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, PARASITIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, VIRAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, MALIGNANT CANCER DISORDERS, METABOLIC DISEASES, NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS, OPHTHALMOLOGY, DISORDERS, POISONING DISORDERS PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS, PULMONARY DISORDERS, RENAL DISORDERS, RHEUMATOLOGICAL DISORDERS, NAUSEA, DIARRHEA, LOCAL PAIN, SYSTEMIC PAIN, OBESITY, ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION, SARCOIDOSIS, SLEEP DISORDERS AND PROVIDING VACCINE TREATMENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 21, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 22, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 10, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 24, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 21, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance