Drawing for MITA

USPTO serial 75546708

MITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AURINI, GEOFFREY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurence R. Brown

LAURENCE R BROWN LAURENCE BROWN AND ASSOCIATES PCSTE 4082001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal tool cases sold empty for carrying a variety of toolsACTIVE—
008Manually operated hand tools, namely, utility knives, snap-off blade knives, retractable blade knives, fixed blade knives, sport knives and pocket knives and replacement blades therefor, aviation snips, bolt cutters, tubing cutters, drill sets, clamps, pliers, adjustable wrenches, socket wrenches, pipe wrenches, socket sets, hammers, rubber mallets, wrecking bars, nail pullers, screwdrivers, nutdrivers, mitre boxes, hand saw guides and metal tool cases designed and specifically fitted to carry the foregoing manually operated hand toolsACTIVE—
009Tape measuresACTIVE—
020Work benchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2000ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 7, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 6, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance