Drawing for ADVANCED HEALTH OUTCOMES

USPTO serial 75546737

ADVANCED HEALTH OUTCOMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVANCED HEALTH OUTCOMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Freya Olive

SUSAN FREYA OLIVE OLIVE & OLIVE PA500 MEMORIAL STPOST OFFICE BOX 2049DURHAM, NC 27702

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042designing data collection systems for others in the health care, medical, and pharmaceutical fields; for database development services, namely compilation and reporting of data for others in the health care, medical and pharmaceutical fields; for designing research studies in the health care, medical, and pharmaceutical fields and providing consultation services related thereto; for providing health, medical and pharmaceutical information; for reviewing standards and practices in the fields of health care, medicine and pharmaceutics; and for scientific and technical consulting, research and analysis services in the health care, medical, and pharmaceutical fieldsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 1999PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 4, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance