Drawing for FIESTA INN

USPTO serial 75546765

FIESTA INN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAJU, RADHIKA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIESTA INN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna Conyers Kuhn, Esq.

ANNA CONYERS KUHN ESQ BAKER & BOTTS, LLP2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-2980UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing golf club services, tennis court facilities and health club servicesACTIVE—
042Hotel and resort hotel services, not including casino servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance