USPTO serial 75546838
THE MEADOWS DEL MAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE MEADOWS DEL MAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darrell L. Olson
DARRELL L OLSON KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESORT HOTEL AND SPA SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |