USPTO serial 75546843
LANDMARK'S STUDENTS' ESSAY PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LANDMARK'S STUDENTS' ESSAY PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane S Lidman
DIANE S LIDMAN HOWARD GORDON KAPLAN, LTD180 N LASALLE ST #2805CHICAGO, IL 60601-2501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing incentive marketing programs and services in the nature of planning, arranging and conducting grocery industry customer coupon, essay contest, and incentive programs featuring travel incentives; promoting the sale of goods and services of others by advertising and promotional activities in the nature of planning, arranging and conducting customer coupon, essay contest, and incentive programs featuring travel incentives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Landmark Incentive Marketing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Landmark Incentive Marketing, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LANDMARK'S STUDENTS' ESSAY PROGRAM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |