Drawing for TALKING HEADS

USPTO serial 75546865

TALKING HEADS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TALKING HEADS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary B. Scott

MARY B SCOTT GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software, namely, software for visual recognition of inanimate and animate objects, including structural mapping, avatar animation, gesture interfaces, video annotation, complex object recognition and three-dimensional reconstruction, for a variety of communication and game applicationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance