Drawing for ULTRA-TRANSVIEW

USPTO serial 75546901

ULTRA-TRANSVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA-TRANSVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009liquid crystal display panel, plasma display panel, braun picture tube, computer monitor, integrated circuits, car navigation system comprising antenna, system unit, display monitor, CD-ROM title, remote controller, radio, radio receiver and global positioning satellite system; car audio-video system comprising television receiver, video player, radio, radio receiver, CD player, CD Changer, monitor, remote controller, speakers and antennaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 26, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 3, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance