USPTO serial 75547142
LCF ROTHSCHILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LCF ROTHSCHILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B LASKY
MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT GOULD SMITH EDELL WELTER & SCHM3100 NORWEST CTR 90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; management of commercial affairs; aid in business management; sales administration; consulting, information of business data; accounting; computer file management | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Insurance; insurance brokerage and consultations; financial affairs, portfolio management services; information services and financial consultations; banking affairs, all banking loan and commission operations; savings; financial estimates, electronic fund transfer; investment services, loans on pledges; investment company; monetary affairs, market brokerage, foreign exchange operations; real estate affairs; issue of traveler's checks and of letters of credit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |