USPTO serial 75547196
PERDUE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERDUE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS A. RETTEW
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING FOOD PRODUCTS, FOOD PREPARATION, FOOD STORAGE, RECIPES, AND APPLICANT VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; and PROVIDING RECIPE EXCHANGE SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Dec 21, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |