USPTO serial 75547254
DRYNIGHTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRYNIGHTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRIDGEWATER, NJ
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS PRODUCTS INC.
BRIDGEWATER, NJ
Other trademarks owned by AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS PRODUCTS INC.
Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Collegeville, PA
Other trademarks owned by Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Collegeville, PA
Other trademarks owned by Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Jacobs-Meadway
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed education materials, namely, brochures, pamphlets and newsletters concerning bedwetting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named DRYNIGHTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |