USPTO serial 75547359
OLIBRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OLIBRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Guildford, Surrey, GU1 1BA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judson K. Champlin
JUDSON K CHAMPLIN WESTMAN CHAMPLIN & KELLY PAINTERNATIONAL CTR STE 1600900 2ND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3319Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS FOR MEDICAL USE; FOOD FOR BABIES; FOOD SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | EDIBLE OILS AND FATS, INCLUDING PALM OIL; MILK; DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | DAIRY PRODUCTS INCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |