Drawing for A-PLEX

USPTO serial 75547365

A-PLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DONNELL, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A-PLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Cone

JOHN M CONE AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLP1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 4100DALLAS, TX 75201-4675UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics and toilet preparations, namely, body lotions, hand creams, foot creams, massage oils and creams, cosmetic astringents, facial and body masks, facial and body exfoliators, lotions and creams, shower gels and scrubs, bubble baths, skin and toilet soaps, bath oils and lotions; creams, lotions and oils for the eye area; creams, lotions and oils for the face; non-medicated preparations for the care of the lips; potpourriACTIVE—
004CandlesACTIVE—
005Dietary and nutritional supplements, vitamins and mineralsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 4, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 27, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance