USPTO serial 75547681
LEGACY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2939011Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 12, 2005
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LEGACY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TAIWAN FU HSING INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
KAOHSIUNG HSIEN, TW
Other trademarks owned by TAIWAN FU HSING INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
TAIWAN FU HSING INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
KAOHSIUNG HSIEN, TW
Other trademarks owned by TAIWAN FU HSING INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
TAIWAN FU HSING INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
KAOHSIUNG HSIEN, TW
Other trademarks owned by TAIWAN FU HSING INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LN FL 4ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC LOCK, ELECTRONIC LOCK, ANTI-THEFT LOCK, MAGNETIC CARD LOCK, ALL ELECTRICAL IN NATURE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TAIWAN FU HSING INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by TAIWAN FU HSING INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by TAIWAN FU HSING INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LEGACY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |