Drawing for CONCERT SELECT

USPTO serial 75547980

CONCERT SELECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCERT SELECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark S. Sommers

MARK S SOMMERS FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Violins, electric and electronic violins, and control units thereforACTIVEAug 5, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 26, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 14, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 1, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 27, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 16, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 7, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 22, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance