USPTO serial 75548013
THE WAY CHAI IS SUPPOSED TO TASTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE WAY CHAI IS SUPPOSED TO TASTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs
HEIDI L SACHS PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE40TH FLSEATTLE, WA 98101-3099Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tea and herbal tea; tea- and herbal tea-based beverages; tea- and herbal tea-based beverages and concentrates with fruit flavoring and/or spices; frozen confections with tea, herbal tea, fruit flavoring and/or spices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TAZO TEA COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Tazo, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Tazo, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named THE WAY CHAI IS SUPPOSED TO TASTE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 5, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |