USPTO serial 75548180
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
70017 Putignano (BA), IT
70017 Putignano (BA), IT
70017 Putignano (BA), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen C. Kassner
Maureen C. Kassner Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP2005 Market StreetOne Commerce Square, Suite 2200Philadelphia, PA 19103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | alcoholic beverages, namely, liqueur | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 2, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 5, 2012 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 5, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |