USPTO serial 75548459
MOBILE SENTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2511381Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2001
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOBILE SENTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis E. Stenzel
Dennis E. Stenzel CHERNOFF, VILHAUER, MCCLUNG & STENZEL600 SW 2nd Ave., Ste 1600PORTLAND, 97204-3157UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRO-OPTICAL RANGE AND SPEED DETECTION, RECORDING AND TRANSMISSION SYSTEM COMPRISING AT LEAST ONE VIDEO CAMERA, A VIDEO RECORDER, AT LEAST ONE VIDEO MONITOR OR LCD FLAT PANEL SCREEN, RADIO FREQUENCY TRANSMITTER AND RECEIVER, COMPUTER HARD DRIVE, AND AN ELECTRONIC CONTROLLER FOR DETECTING, RECORDING, AND TRANSMITTING INFORMATION ABOUT THE RANGE AND SPEED OF MOVING VEHICLES AND AIRCRAFT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 8, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |