Drawing for ORCHID LOUNGE

USPTO serial 75548569

ORCHID LOUNGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2667496Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 31, 2002
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORCHID LOUNGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carol M. Nielsen

Harkness Entertainment1914 McDuffie #6Houston, TX 77019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041NIGHTCLUB ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF LIVE MUSICAL AND DANCE PERFORMANCESECTION 18 - CANCELLEDNov 30, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2009C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Mar 10, 2009CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 23, 2009CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2008PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 7, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 19, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance