USPTO serial 75548667
EXPERIENCE ARCHITECTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPERIENCE ARCHITECTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANNABELLE DANIELVARDA
ANNABELLE DANIELVARDA WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATIPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consultation services in the field of computer software systems integration and computer networking systems for business and industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consultation services in the fields of computers, computing, computer systems integration or computer networking; computer software development for others; design for others of web sites or sites on electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIANT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VIANT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Viant Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EXPERIENCE ARCHITECTURE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |