USPTO serial 75548722
INNOVATIVE BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2367205Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2000
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INNOVATIVE BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan T. Brown
SUSAN T BROWN PILLSBURY MADISON & SUTRO LLP1100 NEW YORK AVE NW 9TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Custom application software for use in data base management; Custom application software for use in accounting, spreadsheets, word-processing, electronic mail, global computer network applications, web sites and web pages; Custom application software for use in computer network administration; Custom application software for configuring, managing and administration of computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation of computer hardware systems and network systems for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer systems analysis and consulting; Computer network integration; Custom application software design for others; Client/server database development; Computer services, namely, creating, maintaining, designing and implementing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; Hosting the web-sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; design of computer hardware systems and network systems for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Business Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Business Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INNOVATIVE BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 8, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |