USPTO serial 75548896
BUMPER BRUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUMPER BRUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Centerville, IA
Centerville, IA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | toothbrushes consisting of a soft pliable head and soft bristles, designed to cushion impact on teeth and gums while brushing | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |