Drawing for UNITED MEDIA DISTRIBUTORS

USPTO serial 75549123

UNITED MEDIA DISTRIBUTORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNITED MEDIA DISTRIBUTORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mimi L. Rodman

MIMI L RODMAN TRIBUNE COMPANY435 N MICHIGAN AVESTE 600CHICAGO, IL 60611-4001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Delivery of newspaper and magazines, and providing delivery information in connection therewithACTIVEMar 23, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 29, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 13, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance