USPTO serial 75549213
HIREWISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIREWISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER S. BURLEIGH
ROGER S BURLEIGH BURLEIGH & ASSOCIATES750 N ST PAUL STSTE 520DALLAS, TX 75201-3244Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DATABASE INFORMATION SERVICES PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH PRE-EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF RISK MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, REPORTS COVERING CRIMINAL HISTORY, EDUCATIONAL VERIFICATION, DRIVING RECORD, PROFESSIONAL LICENSE VERIFICATION, EMPLOYMENT CREDIT REPORT AND PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT VERIFICATION | ACTIVE | May 20, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |