USPTO serial 75549496
OXXO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OXXO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AYTEMIZLER ORGU VE DOKUMA URUNLERI URETIM LIMITED SIRKETI
Ankara, TR
Other trademarks owned by AYTEMIZLER ORGU VE DOKUMA URUNLERI URETIM LIMITED SIRKETI
AYTEMIZLER ORGU VE DOKUMA URUNLERI URETIM LIMITED SIRKETI
Ankara, TR
Other trademarks owned by AYTEMIZLER ORGU VE DOKUMA URUNLERI URETIM LIMITED SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S EGBERT
JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Skirts, sweaters, waistcoats, jackets, trousers, overcoats, raincoats, women's coats, hooded jackets, trench coats, sweat shirts, pullovers, blouses, skirts, parkas, masquerade costumes, dresses, T-shirts, shorts, blue jeans, evening dresses, suits, jump suits, uniforms, bathrobes, bath slippers, beach wear, neckties, bow ties, men's scarves, hats, capes, berets, scarves, gloves, shawls, arm bands, belts, sweat shirts, socks, underskirts, body suits, panties, singlets, brassieres, corsets, camisoles, garters, night dresses, morning dresses, shoes, high boots, sports shoes; parts of shoes, namely, heels, legs, and vamps | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AYTEMIZLER ORGU VE DOKUMA URUNLERI URETIM LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by AYTEMIZLER ORGU VE DOKUMA URUNLERI URETIM LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named OXXO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |