USPTO serial 75549521
FRESHWAY FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRESHWAY FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Bischoff
CHRISTOPHER J BISCHOFF BISCHOFF & ASSOCIATES LTD1731 CENTRAL STEVANSTON, IL 60201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed and precut fruits and vegetables, and salads, namely garden salads, fruit salads, vegetable salads, and salads excluding macaroni, rice, and pasta salads for food service establishments and retail sales | ACTIVE | Aug 2, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |