USPTO serial 75549677
RENAISSANCE DOCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RENAISSANCE DOCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Regard
JOSEPH T REGARD JOSEPH T REGARD, LTDP O BOX 429MADISONVILLE, LA 70447-0429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Newsletters for doctors and dentists on the subjects of medicine, dentistry, and business | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting educational conferences; educational services, namely, conducting conferences, seminars, correspondence courses, and workshops in the fields of medicine, dentistry, and business; and development and dissemination of educational materials in the fields of medicine, dentistry, and business | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAINTREE ESSIX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RAINTREE ESSIX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named RENAISSANCE DOCTOR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |