USPTO serial 75549743
COUNTERPARTS SPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COUNTERPARTS SPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INTEGRATED APPAREL SOLUTIONS, INC
NEW YORK, NY
INTEGRATED APPAREL SOLUTIONS, INC
NEW YORK, NY
CHICAGO, IL
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JASON P. ZEDECK
JASON P ZEDECK CHRISTENSEN, MILLER, FINK, JACOBS, ET AL2121 AVE OF THE STARSEIGHTEENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-5010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's tops and bottoms, including T-shirts, shorts, shirts, pants, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sweaters, jackets, golf shirts, and women's skirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED APPAREL SOLUTIONS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED APPAREL SOLUTIONS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by HFI, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Counterparts Sportswear, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named COUNTERPARTS SPORT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |