USPTO serial 75549798
OMNISCIANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMNISCIANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carole F. Barrett
CAROLE F BARRETT COUDERT BROTHERS4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 3300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4184UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting educational conferences, classes, seminars, exhibitions and workshops with regard to computer networks and distributing course material in connection therewith; educational testing; educational demonstrations; providing incentives to people and organizations to demonstrate excellence in the field of web site development, design, hosting, management, updating, testing and tracking through the issuance of awards and certifications; computer education training services; development and dissemination of educational materials for others in the field of web site and network development, design, hosting, management, updating, testing and tracking; education services, namely, conducting classes, individual instruction, seminars, conferences and workshops, exhibits, design, hosting, management, updating, testing and tracking and distributing course material in connection therewith; educational services in the nature of providing classes, seminars, and individual tutoring, presented in person and through a global computer network in the field of computers, computer networks and computer communications, and distributing course material in connection therewith; providing educational and instructional information in the field of computers, computer software, web site development and electronic commerce, and providing entertainment services, games, films, and music over a global computer network, over internal computer networks, and/or over local and wide area networks; motion picture film, television, radio entertainment, audio recording, and videotape production services; production of print, photographic, audio, video, multimedia, or electronic presentations for others; publication of computer software for others; republication of computer software; providing computer animation consultation services in the field of motion pictures, film, and video production and in the field of broadcast advertising; developing, producing, scripting, interactive television programming; production of graphics and animation; post production services; namely, video editing, sound editing, dubbing and programming special effects; exhibition planning in the field of computers, web site development and software including production of film and video | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |