Drawing for OMNISCIANT

USPTO serial 75549896

OMNISCIANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OMNISCIANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carole F. Barrett

CAROLE F BARRETT COUDERT BROTHERSFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR STE 3300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; providing information in the field of computers, computer software, and website development; consulting services to assist individuals and businesses to access and use a global computer networks, internal computer networks, and local and wide area networks for personal and business use; network communication software services, namely, developing, updating, customizing and maintaining computer software for accessing, providing information to and obtaining information from a global computer network, internal computer networks, and local and wide area networks; computer programming for others; computer system design services for others; graphic art design; packaging design services for others; computer and network systems integration services; computer user interface design services, computer site design; and computer consulting services; providing computer animation consulting services in the field of motion pictures, film and video production and in broadcast advertisingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance