USPTO serial 75549948
VIRTUAL BOUQUET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL BOUQUET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sarnia, Ontario, N7V 2N6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura J, Hein
LAURA J HEIN MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, PA3400 CITY CTR 33 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3796UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RETAIL FLORIST SHOPS; ON-LINE FLORAL STORE SERVICES; ON-LINE ORDERING SERVICES FOR FLOWERS, FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS, PLANTS, ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS AND PLANTS, FRUIT BASKETS, GIFT BASKETS, CHOCOLATES, STUFFED ANIMAL TOYS AND BALLOONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |