Drawing for MAX JAZZ

USPTO serial 75550059

MAX JAZZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAX JAZZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John B. Greenberg

JOHN B GREENBERG THE STOLAR PARTNERSHIP911 WASHINGTON AVE 7TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63101-1290UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio and Video recordings featuring jazz musicACTIVESep 1, 1998
035Management of performing artists, namely, jazz musicians; distributorship in the field of jazz music and jazz related merchandise; online retail services featuring jazz music and jazz related merchandise; retail store services featuring jazz music and jazz related merchandiseACTIVESep 1, 1998
041Entertainment services, namely, sponsoring and promoting musical events featuring jazz, audio recording and production of jazz music, and providing jazz related information about restaurants, artists and clubsACTIVESep 1, 1998
042Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining a jazz-related web site for othersACTIVESep 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 18, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 21, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 28, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 12, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 2, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance