Drawing for MAX JAZZ

USPTO serial 75550060

MAX JAZZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAX JAZZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John B. Greenberg

JOHN B GREENBERG THE STOLAR PARTNERSHIP911 WASHINGTON AVE 7TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63101-1290UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio and Video recordings featuring jazz musicACTIVE—
035Management of performing artists, namely, jazz musicians; online retail store services featuring jazz related merchandise; retail store services featuring jazz music and jazz related merchandise; promoting musical concerts of others featuring jazz music; providing an online computer database featuring jazz music related merchandiseACTIVE—
041Audio recordings and production of jazz music; providing an online computer database featuring jazz music related informationACTIVE—
042Computer software, namely, creating and maintaining a jazz-related web site for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 25, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 2, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance