USPTO serial 75550263
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Birmingham, AL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Graham Beene
H GRAHAM BEENE ATTORNEYS A ND COUNSELORSBURR & FORMAN LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 830719BIRMINGHAM, AL 35283-0719| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, marketed exclusively to banks and other financial institutions, for use in capturing, storing, retrieving and reproducing images of documents; computer software, marketed exclusively to banks and other financial institutions, for use in providing a telephone banking system; computer software, marketed exclusively to banks and other financial institutions, for use in producing personalized checks and check books; computer software, marketed exclusively to banks and other financial institutions, for use in document management; computer software, marketed exclusively to banks and other financial institutions, for use in creating and maintaining files of checking and savings accounts that can be used for building National Automated Clearing House Association files | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |