USPTO serial 75550298
BUNNINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUNNINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BUNNINGS BUILDING SUPPLIES PTY LTD.
Perth, Westem Australia, AT
Other trademarks owned by BUNNINGS BUILDING SUPPLIES PTY LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael L. Mau
MICHAEL L MAU MAU & KRULLPOST OFFICE BOX 18455MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, LUMBER FLOORING, LUMBER DECKING, LAMINATED LUMBER BEAMS, LUMBER MILL WORK; NON-METALLIC RIGID PIPES FOR BUILDING; NON-METALLIC TRANSPORTABLE BUILDINGS; LUMBER; LUMBER FOR BUILDING; LUMBER FRAME WORK, NAMELY, DOOR FRAMES, WINDOW FRAMES; LUMBER DOORS, WINDOWS, WOOD PANELLING, FLOOR BOARDS, PARQUETRY, WOOD VENEERS, PARTICLE BOARD, PLYWOOD; LUMBER AND LUMBER PRODUCTS, NAMELY, LUMBER FURNITURE COMPONENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |