USPTO serial 75550509
VIALINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIALINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Faier
JAMES FAIER FAIER & FAIER566 W ADAMS STSTE 600CHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Land Information Systems (LIS) are based upon survey and mapping technologies that provide a geographical spatial display of both natural and man-made features of an area. GIS/LIS also includes other data, information and attributes associated with these features. GIS/LIS uses data from the Global Positioning System (GPS), aerial photography and conventional land surveying and mapping in its development of a digital terrain midel (DTM) . This DTM and associated information is compiled into a query-able database. As such, GIS/LIS is essentially a full service spatial information management systems consulting application. Typical uses of GIS/LIS include-- topographic and hydrographic surveying, domestic and international grid networks, data-capture digitizing, data conversion, census data importation, parcel mapping, emergency 911 fire/rescue quick routing, tax mapping and folio data capture, voter precinct districts, and surface and underground mapping, among others | ACTIVE | Mar 30, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |