Drawing for OPTICAL POPS

USPTO serial 75550519

OPTICAL POPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2727401Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 17, 2003
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTICAL POPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc M. Gorelnik

Marc M. Gorelnik Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, 8th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CANDY AND LOLLIPOPS WITH NOVELTY STICKSEXPIREDJun 21, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Apr 7, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 17, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 16, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 21, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 2, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 24, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 7, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 4, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance