Drawing for RWD TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 75550655

RWD TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2533232Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 2002
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with RWD TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAULA D. JOHNSON

PAULA D. JOHNSON RWD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC5521 Research Park DriveBaltimore, MD 21228UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPING EDUCATIONAL TRAINING MANUALS AND TRAINING MATERIALS FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER DATABASESSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 5, 1998
042CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER FIELDS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, CREATION AND CUSTOMIZATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE TEMPLATES, USED BY OTHERS TO TRAIN USERS ON COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS USAGE, AND CREATION AND CUSTOMIZATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED BY OTHERS TO CREATE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION FOR COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER CONSULTATIONSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 5, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2012CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Apr 18, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 12, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 29, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 1, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 29, 2008E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 10, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 6, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 24, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 25, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance