USPTO serial 75550796
POWERLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chris Wilson
MELISSA CROSS IP DOCKETINGARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 12TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Utility services in the nature of natural gas, fuel oil, propane and electrical power distribution to retail, wholesale, industrial and commercial customers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Landscape gardening and vegetation design and management services for retail, wholesale, industrial and commercial customers; conducting energy audits and providing information and advice regarding the efficient use of energy, consulting services in the field of energy use, energy management and conservation for retail, wholesale, industrial and commercial customers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Delmarva Power & Light Company
- Other trademarks owned by Delmarva Power & Light Company
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named POWERLINK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |