Drawing for GOLDEN GRIDDLE F A M I L Y RE S T A U RA N TS

USPTO serial 75551031

GOLDEN GRIDDLE F A M I L Y RE S T A U RA N TS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDEN GRIDDLE F A M I L Y RE S T A U RA N TS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Feldman

MARK I FELDMAN PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFEP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Restaurant services namely sit-down and take-out restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 4, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 5, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 22, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 29, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 4, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance