USPTO serial 75551115
@RGENTUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with @RGENTUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR
JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR620 NEWPORT CTR DR 16TH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-8016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MUTUAL FUND BROKERAGE; MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENT; FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND INVESTMENT ANALYSIS; AND, FINANCIAL ADVISING, NAMELY, PROVIDING INVESTMENT COUNSELING AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |