USPTO serial 75551158
PINPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PINPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES E WEINSTEIN
CHARLES E WEINSTEIN FOLEY HOAG LLP155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02210-2600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic locating systems comprising antennae that emit and detect high frequency radio signals, electronic tags that respond to the signals, microprocessor-based computer hardware and computer software that calculate tag locations from antennae signals, and computer software for storing, mapping, displaying and tracking tag locations; computer software for developing applications related to storing, mapping, displaying and tracking tag locations; user manuals sold as a unit with the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RF TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RF TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PinPoint Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PINPOINT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |