Drawing for S KAO SOFINA

USPTO serial 75551214

S KAO SOFINA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S KAO SOFINA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS UNITED NATIONSFROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetic products, namely, facial cleansers, skin care lotions and creams, foundation makeup, and compacts containing makeupACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 15, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance