USPTO serial 75551231
SAGEWAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAGEWAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Crutcher
WILLIAM C CRUTCHER GAGER & PETERSON LLPPO BOX 2480ONE EXCHANGE PLWATERBURY, CT 67222480Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | browser-based computer application program providing information in the field of business inquiries, business research and business investigations, which searches, collates and displays information from both internal and external data sources, by means of a global computer network | ABANDONED | Jul 27, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |