USPTO serial 75551232
SAGEBLADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAGEBLADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Crutcher
WILLIAM C CRUTCHER GAGER & PETERSON LLPONE EXCHANGE PL PO BOX 2480WATERBURY, CT 06722-2480UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded computer software on CD-ROMs or diskettes, or downloaded from a remote computer site, for use in query and search, analysis, reporting, data comparison across diverse sources, displaying results, and generating reports, all in the field of business inquiries, business research and business investigations | ABANDONED | Jul 27, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |