Drawing for SAGESERVER

USPTO serial 75551234

SAGESERVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SAGESERVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William C. Crutcher

WILLIAM C CRUTCHER GAGER & PETERSON LLPONE EXCHANGE PL PO BOX 2480WATERBURY, CT 06722-2480UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer server software for use in the field of business inquiries, business research and business investigations accessed by customer clients within a local area network or intranetABANDONEDJul 27, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 30, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 30, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 30, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 23, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 23, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 1, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance