USPTO serial 75551510
NET ADVERTISING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NET ADVERTISING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Repentigny, Quebec J5Y 3N3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erica R Borenstein
ERICA R BORENSTEIN DORSEY & WHITNEY LLPREPUBLIC PLZ BLDG STE 4700370 17TH STDENVER, CO 80202-5647Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | nets used as barricades during sporting events and for protecting spectator areas | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Nets for sports and recreation, namely, basketball, volleyball, lacrosse, soccer, hockey, football, field hockey, hand ball, tennis, water polo, and badminton nets; nets for carrying sports balls; fishing nets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |