Drawing for ARAMCO

USPTO serial 75551895

ARAMCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARAMCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas E. Spath

THOMAS E SPATH ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004As a house mark for fuels and lubricants derived from petroleum; crude oil; petroleum and refined petroleum products; namely, industrial oils and greases,automotive oils and greases, motor oils, petroleum and mineral waxes and wax compounds; hydrocarbon fuels in liquid and gaseous form, automotive fuels, diesel fuels, gasoline, aviation fuel, ethane, butane and propane fuel gas; petroleum illuminants; synthetic lubricantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 12, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 21, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 12, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 15, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 23, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 30, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance