USPTO serial 75551896
SAUDI ARAMCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAUDI ARAMCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas E. Spath
THOMAS E SPATH ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | House mark for fuels and lubricants derived from petroleum; crude oil; petroleum and refined petroleum products, namely, industrial oils and greases, automotive oils and greases, motor oils, petroleum and mineral waxes and wax compounds; hydrocarbon fuels in liquid and gaseous form, automotive fuels, diesel fuels, gasoline, aviation fuel, ethane, butane and propane fuel gas; petroleum illuminants; and synthetic lubricants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 25, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |