USPTO serial 75552022
VORTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VORTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Held
JOHN J HELD MCANDREWS, HELD, & MALLOY LTD500 W MADISON ST STE 3400CHICAGO, IL 60661UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | AUTOMOBILE EXHAUST SYSTEM PARTS, NAMELY, MUFFLERS, TAIL PIPES, EXHAUST PIPES; AUTOMOBILE EXHAUST SYSTEM PARTS, NAMELY, MUFFLERS, TAIL PIPES, AND EXHAUST PIPES; AUTOMOBILE EXHAUST SYSTEM PARTS, NAMELY, MUFFLERS, TAIL PIPES, EXHAUST PIPES, MOUNTING CLAMPS AND BRACKETS, ALL SOLD AS A UNIT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 27, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 27, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |